Molecular Machinery
← ATP synthase

Evidence and sources

Each number on the ATP synthase page goes back to an experiment or a calculation. Each card shows the result, how it was measured, and where it was published.

Measurements

Loading the measurements…

Big picture numbers

MeasuredWatt 2010, opens the source in a new tabYasuda 1998, opens the source in a new tab
CalculatedWatt 2010, opens the source in a new tab
CalculatedStrauss 2008, opens the source in a new tabDavies 2011, opens the source in a new tab
CalculatedStrauss 2008, opens the source in a new tabDavies 2011, opens the source in a new tabWatt 2010, opens the source in a new tab
EstimateBNID 111476, opens the source in a new tab
EstimateNeubauer 2007, opens the source in a new tab
CalculatedBNID 105606, opens the source in a new tabCell Biology by the Numbers, opens the source in a new tab
CalculatedBNID 105606, opens the source in a new tabCell Biology by the Numbers, opens the source in a new tabWatt 2010, opens the source in a new tab

Structures

  • 8H9S
    Human F1Fo monomer, rotary state 1
    Most complete high-resolution mammalian F1Fo model: full c8 ring, subunit a, peripheral stalk and all nucleotides. Electron microscopy, 2.53 Å.
  • 8H9T
    Human F1Fo, rotary state 2
    Second 120° rotary state of the same human enzyme; no IF1. Morph target from state 1. Electron microscopy, 2.77 Å.
  • 8H9U
    Human F1Fo, rotary state 3a
    Third 120° rotary state; closes the three-state cycle for animation. Electron microscopy, 2.61 Å.
  • 8H9V
    Human F1Fo, rotary substate 3b
    A substate inside one 120° step; shows that the rotor does not jump in one rigid move. Electron microscopy, 3.02 Å.
  • 1BMF
    Bovine F1 head, crystal (classic)
    The structure that showed three β subunits in three different states, the basis of the rotary binding-change picture. X-ray diffraction, 2.85 Å.
  • 2V7Q
    Bovine F1 inhibited by IF1
    Natural brake part: IF1 wedges into the βDP-αDP interface and blocks ATP hydrolysis. X-ray diffraction, 2.1 Å.
  • 2XND
    Bovine F1-c8 rotor complex
    c-ring swap set, n = 8: the structure that established the c8 ring and H+/ATP = 2.7 in animal mitochondria. X-ray diffraction, 3.5 Å.
  • 6CP6
    Yeast mitochondrial F1Fo monomer (c10)
    Fungal mitochondrial enzyme in a lipid bilayer, with a c10 ring instead of the animal c8. Electron microscopy, 3.6 Å.
  • 6B8H
    Yeast mitochondrial F1Fo dimer
    Full dimer model: the V-shaped pair whose membrane subunits bend the inner membrane into cristae. The title says monomer, but the entry holds two copies of every subunit. Electron microscopy, 3.6 Å.
  • 6OQR
    E. coli F1Fo (c10)
    The minimal bacterial enzyme (8 subunit types) with a c10 ring. Electron microscopy, 3.1 Å.
  • 6N2Y
    Bacillus PS3 F1Fo (c10)
    Thermophilic bacterial enzyme; shows how ε blocks hydrolysis but allows synthesis. Electron microscopy, 3 Å.
  • 6FKF
    Spinach chloroplast CF1Fo (c14)
    Plant enzyme with a large c14 ring (H+/ATP 4.7 by structure) and a redox off-switch. Electron microscopy, 3.15 Å.
  • 7TMR
    Yeast V-ATPase (rotary pump)
    Evolution: the V-type relative that runs the rotary mechanism as an ATP-driven proton pump. Electron microscopy, 3.5 Å.
  • 4V1G
    c9 ring, mycobacterial (H+)
    c-ring swap set, n = 9 (H+/ATP = 3.0). Drug-free partner of 4V1F. X-ray diffraction, 1.55 Å.
  • 3U2F
    c10 ring, yeast mitochondria (H+)
    c-ring swap set, n = 10 (H+/ATP = 3.3). X-ray diffraction, 2 Å.
  • 4BEM
    F/V hybrid ring, Acetobacterium woodii (Na+)
    c-ring swap set: 9:1 F/V hybrid with 10 Na+ sites; a link between synthases and pumps. X-ray diffraction, 2.1 Å.
  • 1YCE
    c11 ring, Ilyobacter tartaricus (Na+)
    c-ring swap set, n = 11, the classic Na+ rotor. X-ray diffraction, 2.4 Å.
  • 3ZK1
    c11 ring, Fusobacterium nucleatum (Na+)
    Second Na+ rotor with a two-carboxylate ion site, from a human pathogen. X-ray diffraction, 2.2 Å.
  • 3ZO6
    c12 ring, engineered B. pseudofirmus (H+)
    c-ring swap set, n = 12: a point mutation shrinks the ring by one subunit. X-ray diffraction, 4.104 Å.
  • 2X2V
    c13 ring, Bacillus pseudofirmus OF4 (H+)
    c-ring swap set, n = 13 (H+/ATP = 4.3), wild-type partner of the c12 mutant. X-ray diffraction, 2.5 Å.
  • 6TQJ
    c14 ring, spinach chloroplast (H+)
    c-ring swap set, n = 14 (H+/ATP = 4.7). Higher resolution than 2W5J. X-ray diffraction, 2.3 Å.
  • 2WIE
    c15 ring, Spirulina (Arthrospira) (H+)
    c-ring swap set, n = 15 (H+/ATP = 5.0), the largest ring in this set. X-ray diffraction, 2.13 Å.
  • 2BL2
    K10 ring, V-type Na+-ATPase (Enterococcus hirae)
    Evolution comparison: a V-type rotor ring built from four-helix subunits. X-ray diffraction, 2.1 Å.
  • 4V1F
    c9 ring + bedaquiline
    Drug swap: bedaquiline clamps every ion site of the mycobacterial c-ring. X-ray diffraction, 1.697 Å.
  • 7JGC
    Mycobacterial Fo + bedaquiline
    Drug swap in context: bedaquiline pockets at the a/c interface of the intact Fo. Electron microscopy, 3.4 Å.
  • 8KI3
    Human F1Fo + bedaquiline
    Same drug on the human enzyme: explains off-target binding; same chain lettering as the hero. Electron microscopy, 2.89 Å.
  • 4F4S
    Yeast c10 ring + oligomycin A
    Drug swap: oligomycin binds the outer face of the c-ring at the proton site. X-ray diffraction, 1.9 Å.

References

  1. 1Abrahams et al., Nature 1994
  2. 2Lai et al., Mol Cell 2023
  3. 3Noji et al., Nature 1997
  4. 4Yasuda et al., Cell 1998
  5. 5Yasuda et al., Nature 2001
  6. 6Itoh et al., Nature 2004
  7. 7Diez et al., Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004
  8. 8Boyer, Annu Rev Biochem 1997
  9. 9Watt et al., PNAS 2010
  10. 10Shimabukuro et al., PNAS 2003
  11. 11Mulkidjanian et al., Nat Rev Microbiol 2007
  12. 12Allegretti et al., Nature 2015
  13. 13Mitome et al., PNAS 2004
  14. 14Pogoryelov et al., PNAS 2012
  15. 15Ueno et al., Nat Commun 2025
  16. 16Meier et al., Science 2005
  17. 17Pogoryelov et al., Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009
  18. 18Vollmar et al., J Biol Chem 2009
  19. 19Preiss et al., PLoS Biol 2010
  20. 20Preiss et al., PNAS 2013
  21. 21Preiss et al., Sci Adv 2015
  22. 22Symersky et al., Nat Struct Mol Biol 2012
  23. 23Symersky et al., PNAS 2012
  24. 24Schulz et al., PLoS Biol 2013
  25. 25Matthies et al., Nat Commun 2014
  26. 26Murata et al., Science 2005
  27. 27Gledhill et al., PNAS 2007
  28. 28Vlasov et al., Sci Rep 2019
  29. 29Guo et al., Nature 2021
  30. 30Zhang et al., Nature 2024
  31. 31Andries et al., Science 2005
  32. 32Srivastava et al., Science 2018
  33. 33Guo et al., Science 2017
  34. 34Hahn et al., Science 2018
  35. 35Sobti et al., Nat Commun 2020
  36. 36Guo et al., eLife 2019
  37. 37Vasanthakumar et al., Nat Struct Mol Biol 2022
  38. 38Murphy et al., Science 2019
  39. 39Petersen et al., PNAS 2012
  40. 40Turina et al., Biochim Biophys Acta 2016
  41. 41Ye et al., Biochim Biophys Acta 2004
  42. 42Imada et al., PNAS 2007
  43. 43Ibuki et al., Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011
  44. 44Courbet et al., Science 2022
  45. 45Kosugi et al., Nat Chem 2023
  46. 46Yamori et al., Plant Physiol 2011
  47. 47Soong et al., Science 2000
  48. 48NIST CODATA value: Faraday constant